'Tragedy and the Common Man in Hamlet\r'

'Katelyn Stoll Professor hallway English 102 11 November 2009 â€Å"Tragedy and the mutual Man” in hamlet Arthur miller nones that, â€Å"The tragic feeling is evoked in us when we are in the social movement of a character who is ready to invest down his career, if need be, to define wholeness thingâ€his sense of personal self-worth” (1). This characteristic envisionn in most tragedies is by all odds evident in the character of Prince crossroads in Shakespeare’s play small town. The importee that village learns from the ghost that Claudius has committed regicide, his goal becomes clear: he has to visit the expiry of his father by murdering his uncle.\r\ncrossroads could non stand idly by mend the assassin of his saintly father had an familiarity with his mother Gertrude and lied to the people of Denmark. However, Hamlet’s tragic taint prevents him from winning satisfy quickly. During the course of the play, the prince notes that he has tho to perform any action against his uncle Claudius, and he wonders why this is. The character of Hamlet is given to reasoning and long soliloquies, not action; this, in my opinion, is his tragic flaw. The apparition of the after-hours Hamlet informs his son that Claudius, the current business leader of Denmark, poisoned him.\r\nUpon hearing the news, Hamlet is enraged and swears to engross revenge against his usurping uncle. Almost immediately he is ready to lay down his life to correct what has been done, and he now has a â€Å"… pass oningness to throw all he has into the contest, the dispute to secure his rightful place in his world” (3). It is at this moment in the play that Hamlet takes on the mapping of the familiar tragic superstar and acts accordingly. He was displaced from the life that he knew and loved and was not awarded with his rightful position in society.\r\nHamlet should be the king of Denmark if what the ghost told him is sure; not o nly is Hamlet not the king of Denmark, barely also his cordial health is constantly being called into question. He is losing ranks in society awfully quickly, and representative of Arthur Miller’s definition of the tragic hero is that the hero strives to pass judgment himself comelyly. His tragic flaw does not allow him to recall his personal dignity, however, and Hamlet becomes frustrated over time because of this. He either takes in any case much time thinking everything through, or he reacts impulsively and violently when the moorage does not call for it.\r\nThis is seen when Hamlet unexpectedly stabs Polonius to death, thinking him to be a spy. His tragic flaw is not knowing when or how to act aggressively, and it really costs him in the end. According to Miller, â€Å"For, if it is true to say that in essence the tragic hero is use upon claiming his whole due as a personality, and if this struggle must be summation and without reservation, then it automatica lly demonstrates the indestructible will of man to achieve his humanity” (4).\r\nHe argues that the tragic play has a atomic reactor more to offer the spectator than just a sad or luckless mop up. Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet concludes with the deaths of Gertrude, Laertes, Hamlet and Claudius. The aim of this play, however, is not that four people died, but that Hamlet was finally able to avenge the death of his father. Although this was not a blameless victory for Hamlet, he was able to let out his goals, and this demonstrates the will of man (even the common man) to secure his sense of personal dignity. The thrust for granting immunity is the quality in tragedy which exalts” (3). The conclusion of Hamlet is both a wondrous and depressing one. In one sense, Hamlet is not a tragic hero, because he was able to overcome his tragic flaw and slay Claudius. In another more realistic sense, however, he perfectly fits the description of the tragic hero because h e does not live long enough to see the benefits of his actions. Hamlet is never able to evaluate himself justly, and that was his main objective. In the tragic lieu the need of man to wholly realize himself is the only fixed star, and whatever it is that hedges his genius and lowers it is ripe for attack and examination” (3). Hamlet perfectly adheres to the definition of the tragic hero of Arthur Miller, because of his need to regain his personal dignity, his tragic flaw preventing him for achieving this, and a tragic ending in which his goals are never realized. whole kit and caboodle Cited â€Å"Tragedy and the Common Man by Arthur Miller. ” Home Page of TheLiteraryLink, Dr. Janice Patten. Web. 02 Dec. 2009. .\r\n'