Thursday, February 7, 2019
Justice As Desert: Is There Any Such Thing? :: Philosophy Philosophical Essays
Justice As Desert Is There whatsoever Such Thing?ABSTRACT Philosopher Matthew Lipman, in Social Inquiry, says that there are instances in which what one deserves may be specified fairly readily. A sick child deserves medical specialty, a hungry(p) child deserves food, children deserve an education... This seems to mention that these are cases in which what one deserves is clear-cut, and tho when the cases compel more complicated does it become progressively more embarrassing to determine desert. I would submit that these cases are not around so cut-and-dry, in terms of find out desert, as one efficacy imagine. Is it really correct to say that a sick child deserves medicine? Who is to say? Who is to be the ultimate justice? Is there some relegate of authority or power (higher or otherwise) who is looked to in order to stigma such a determination (or who is looked to in order to justify qualification such an assertion in the start-off place)? Is desert to be refractory b ased on need? On abundance of what is deserved? On legal entitlements? This paper will address just such questions. Philosopher Matthew Lipman, in Social Inquiry, says that there are instances in which what one deserves may be specified fairly readily. A sick child deserves medicine, a hungry child deserves food, children deserve an education.... (1) This seems to imply that these are cases in which what one deserves is clear-cut, and only when the cases become more complicated does it become progressively more difficult to determine desert. (2) I would reply not so fast. These aforementioned cases, I submit, are not nearly so cut-and-dried, in terms of determining desert, as one might imagine. Is it really correct to say that a sick child deserves medicine? Who is to say? Who is to be the ultimate arbiter? Is there some sort of authority or power (higher or otherwise) who is looked to in order to make such a determination (or who is looked to in order to justify making such an asse rtion in the first place)? Certainly, a sick child usually needs certain medical specialty in order to get better. Moreover, in a society in which such medicament is plentiful, legislators may be prompted to enact a justice that stipulates that all sick children are entitled legally to such medication. moreover do they deserve such medication, just because they need it or the medication is abundant or they are legally entitled to it?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment