Bouncers Essay

BOUNCERS BOUNCERS John Godbers joke, BOUNCERS, was written and performed in the year 1977 and captures the generalize stereotypes of a group of Bouncers, Girls and Lagalads on a night knocked out(p) in the town. With only four members in the cast, Godber cleverly directs the performance to be comedic and slowly escortable through the actors purposeisation and clever use of punk and set. The dramatic event takes you through a typical Friday night in town at a club called asylum, which creates a strong reference suggesting it is a jell where all the crazy people go.It begins with apiece of the four bouncers individually go on stage with a solid posture as a Bouncer. Each one would then suddenly break out into a dance move the first bouncer was able to lock and cut beat really well and as each one came out, the worse they got, immediately connecting with the earreach as they piece it hilarious. This is one of Godbers techniques to keep the sense of hearing engaged at al l times, as jokes atomic number 18 told that the audience understand and can relate to, ultimately making the performance more enjoyable for both the actors and audience.The play then continues on to tell the story in episodes due to its episodic structure, about a group of four girls who atomic number 18 preparing for a night out. Godbers use of clean transitions allowed the plot to dilate fluently the only four objects on stage (four beer barrels), were collected by the actors whilst they spoke, and two actors collected a beer barrel each to be dictated into the centre of the stage acting as chairs and then would continue on to the next cyclorama, making it clear to the audience that there was a dead reckoning change by introducing the characters they were representing.This is one of Godbers techniques that was influenced by Bertolt Brecht, which is used to unwrap the audience thinking about what the characters are like and just boil down on the performance. The lighting amidst transitions in any case indicated that there was a scene change, as it would either the whole stage would either be brilliantly lit or dimmer and more intimate, which is another influence of Brechts, as he would contrast and juxtaposition scenes. I found that by introducing the characters, the audience were able to enjoy he performance as they were constantly told who the actors were representing and didnt get confused. However, I found that because the characterisation betwixt each of the characters they played was so different and you were able to differentiate between each one easily, the constant introductions were unnecessary. The acting style for all of the actors was very(prenominal)(prenominal) comedic throughout the play. This was portrayed extremely rough-and-readyly, as their slick comedic timing between lines was fast and sharp making it very humorous.The characterisation of each of the characters also added to the prank, especially when they were represent ing the female characters, as their bodies were very relaxed and they used exaggerated maidenlike gestures. Additionally, their versatile use of vocals created even further humour, as they could be tatty and raucous lagalads, contrasting to soft and gentle women and this created a lot of fun for the audience, keeping them engaged throughout the whole play. Godbers choice of a completely open setting worked effectively for this type of performance.The entertainment in the play was purely created by actors themselves, and the set didnt detract out from this but emphasised it. By being completely open, the audience are able to see the good quality of acting the actors could do as they didnt have any support from any sort of set. The lighting however, set the scene as much as the actors, as the news bulletin and changing lights indicated that they were dancing in the club, whereas the solid flickering lights positioned on each actor clearly and effectively indicated that they were portraying a scene on a bus.This scene was also clear due to the actors jiggering up and down and miming holding on to a handle bar above their heads. This effective scene was one of my personal highlights of the play as it was a very clever technique used by Godber and was clearly recognised. My other best-loved scene was the hairdressers near the beginning, and particularly in that scene one of the actors development their hands and clicking their fingers behind someones another actors head representing a pair of scissors cutting someones hair. I found this extremely effective and easily recognisable.I particularly liked the transition between the hairdressers scene into the barbers immediately after, as all of the actors simply stood up out of character and said Barbers, indicating the scene change, and this was emphasised by the animalism dropping from the women into loud and scrambling men. I thoroughly enjoyed BOUNCERS due to its comedy style and the actors excellent acting . As it was very up to date with the choice of music and clubbing scenes, I could engage with the play easily as it is what I am being brought up slightly in society today and this slowed me to enjoy it even further.